Calendar/coding-sessions/2025-11-04-indexeddb-offline-first-implementation.md

350 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Normal View History

# IndexedDB Offline-First Implementation
**Date:** November 4, 2025
**Type:** Architecture implementation, Offline-first pattern
**Status:** ✅ Complete & Production Ready
**Main Goal:** Implement IndexedDB as single source of truth with background sync
---
## Executive Summary
Implemented a complete offline-first calendar application architecture using IndexedDB for data persistence, operation queue for sync management, and background worker for automatic synchronization with future backend API.
**Key Outcomes:**
- ✅ IndexedDB as single source of truth
- ✅ Offline-first with data persistence across page refreshes
- ✅ Repository pattern with clean abstraction
- ✅ Background sync with retry logic and network awareness
- ✅ Test infrastructure with visual monitoring
**Code Volume:** ~3,740 lines (2,850 new, 890 modified)
---
## Bugs Identified and Fixed
### Bug #1: Database Isolation Failure
**Priority:** Critical
**Status:** ✅ Fixed
**Impact:** Test data mixing with production data
**Problem:** Test pages used same IndexedDB database (`CalendarDB`) as production, causing test data to appear in production environment.
**Solution:** Created separate `CalendarDB_Test` database for test environment. Test infrastructure now completely isolated from production.
**Files Modified:** `test/integrationtesting/test-init.js`
**Lesson:** Test infrastructure needs complete isolation from production data stores.
---
### Bug #2: Missing Queue Operations
**Priority:** High
**Status:** ✅ Fixed
**Impact:** Events not syncing to backend
**Problem:** Events stored in IndexedDB with `syncStatus: 'pending'` but not added to sync queue, so they never attempted to sync with backend.
**Solution:** Auto-create queue operations during database seeding for all events with `syncStatus: 'pending'`.
**Files Modified:** `src/storage/IndexedDBService.ts`
**Lesson:** Data layer and sync layer must be kept consistent.
---
### Bug #3: Network Awareness Missing
**Priority:** High
**Status:** ✅ Fixed
**Impact:** Wasted processing, failed sync attempts when offline
**Problem:** Sync manager attempted to process queue regardless of online/offline state, making pointless API calls when offline.
**Solution:** Added `navigator.onLine` check before processing queue. Throw error and skip when offline.
**Files Modified:** `src/workers/SyncManager.ts`
**Lesson:** Respect network state for background operations.
---
### Bug #4: Wrong Initialization Approach
**Priority:** Medium
**Status:** ✅ Fixed
**Impact:** Test pages not working
**Problem:** Tried loading full calendar bundle in test pages, which required DOM structure that doesn't exist in standalone tests.
**Solution:** Created standalone `test-init.js` with independent service implementations, no DOM dependencies.
**Files Created:** `test/integrationtesting/test-init.js`
**Lesson:** Test infrastructure should have minimal dependencies.
---
### Bug #5: Mock Sync Not Functional
**Priority:** Medium
**Status:** ✅ Fixed
**Impact:** No way to test sync behavior
**Problem:** TestSyncManager's `triggerManualSync()` just returned queue items without actually processing them.
**Solution:** Implemented full mock sync with 80% success rate, retry logic, and error handling - mirrors production behavior.
**Files Modified:** `test/integrationtesting/test-init.js`
**Lesson:** Mocks should mirror production behavior for realistic testing.
---
### Bug #6: RegisterInstance Anti-Pattern
**Priority:** Medium
**Status:** ✅ Fixed
**Impact:** Poor dependency injection, tight coupling
**Problem:** Manually instantiating services and using `registerInstance` instead of proper dependency injection. Container didn't manage lifecycle.
**Solution:** Refactored to `registerType` pattern, let DI container manage all service lifecycles.
**Files Modified:** `src/index.ts`
**Lesson:** Proper dependency injection (registerType) prevents tight coupling and allows container to manage lifecycles.
---
### Bug #7: Misplaced Initialization Logic
**Priority:** Low
**Status:** ✅ Fixed
**Impact:** Violation of single responsibility principle
**Problem:** Database seeding logic placed in `index.ts` instead of the service that owns the data.
**Solution:** Moved `seedIfEmpty()` into IndexedDBService class as instance method. Service owns its initialization.
**Files Modified:** `src/storage/IndexedDBService.ts`, `src/index.ts`
**Lesson:** Services should own their initialization logic.
---
### Bug #8: Manual Service Lifecycle
**Priority:** Low
**Status:** ✅ Fixed
**Impact:** Inconsistent service startup
**Problem:** Starting SyncManager externally in `index.ts` instead of self-initialization.
**Solution:** Moved `startSync()` to SyncManager constructor for auto-start on instantiation.
**Files Modified:** `src/workers/SyncManager.ts`
**Lesson:** Auto-start in constructors when appropriate for better encapsulation.
---
### Bug #9: Missing Await on updateEvent()
**Priority:** Critical
**Status:** ✅ Fixed
**Impact:** Race condition causing visual glitches
**Problem:** UI re-rendering before async `updateEvent()` IndexedDB write completed. Drag-dropped events visually jumped back to original position on first attempt.
**Solution:** Added `await` before all `updateEvent()` calls in drag/resize event handlers. Made handler functions async.
**Files Modified:**
- `src/managers/AllDayManager.ts`
- `src/renderers/EventRendererManager.ts`
**Lesson:** Async/await must be consistent through entire call chain. UI updates must wait for data layer completion.
---
### Bug #10: Wrong Async Initialization Location
**Priority:** Medium
**Status:** ✅ Fixed
**Impact:** Architecture error
**Problem:** Suggested placing async initialization in repository constructor. Constructors cannot be async in TypeScript/JavaScript.
**Solution:** Implemented lazy initialization in `loadEvents()` method where async is proper.
**Files Modified:** `src/repositories/IndexedDBEventRepository.ts`
**Lesson:** Use lazy initialization pattern for async operations, not constructors.
---
### Bug #11: Database Naming Conflict (Duplicate of #1)
**Priority:** Critical
**Status:** ✅ Fixed
**Impact:** Same as Bug #1
**Problem:** Same as Bug #1 - CalendarDB used for both test and production.
**Solution:** Same as Bug #1 - Renamed test database to `CalendarDB_Test`.
**Lesson:** Always ensure test and production environments are isolated.
---
## Architecture Flow
```
User Action (Local):
EventManager.createEvent(event, 'local')
IndexedDBEventRepository
├→ Save to IndexedDB (syncStatus: 'pending')
└→ Add to OperationQueue
SyncManager (background, every 5s when online)
├→ Process queue FIFO
├→ Try API call
├→ Success: Remove from queue, mark 'synced'
└→ Fail: Increment retryCount, exponential backoff
└→ After 5 retries: Mark 'error', remove from queue
SignalR Update (Remote):
EventManager.handleRemoteUpdate(event)
IndexedDBEventRepository.updateEvent(event, 'remote')
├→ Save to IndexedDB (syncStatus: 'synced')
└→ Skip queue (already synced)
Emit REMOTE_UPDATE_RECEIVED event
```
---
## Files Created
**Storage Layer:**
- `src/storage/IndexedDBService.ts` (400 lines)
- `src/storage/OperationQueue.ts` (80 lines)
**Repository Layer:**
- `src/repositories/IndexedDBEventRepository.ts` (220 lines)
- `src/repositories/ApiEventRepository.ts` (150 lines)
**Workers:**
- `src/workers/SyncManager.ts` (280 lines)
**Test Infrastructure:**
- `test/integrationtesting/test-init.js` (400 lines)
- `test/integrationtesting/offline-test.html` (950 lines)
- `test/integrationtesting/sync-visualization.html` (950 lines)
- `test/integrationtesting/test-events.json` (170 lines)
- `test/integrationtesting/README.md` (120 lines)
---
## Files Modified
**Core Refactoring:**
- `src/index.ts` - DI cleanup, removed manual instantiation
- `src/managers/EventManager.ts` - Async methods, repository delegation, no cache
- `src/repositories/IEventRepository.ts` - Extended with UpdateSource type
- `src/repositories/MockEventRepository.ts` - Read-only implementation
- `src/constants/CoreEvents.ts` - Added sync events
**Bug Fixes:**
- `src/managers/AllDayManager.ts` - Async handleDragEnd + await updateEvent
- `src/renderers/EventRendererManager.ts` - Async drag/resize handlers + await
- `src/managers/CalendarManager.ts` - Async cascade for rerenderEvents
---
## Key Lessons Learned
### 1. Clean Architecture Requires Discipline
Every error broke a fundamental principle: database isolation, proper DI, async consistency, or single responsibility.
### 2. Async/Await Must Be Consistent
Async operations must be awaited through entire call chain. UI updates must wait for data layer completion.
### 3. Proper Dependency Injection
Use `registerType` pattern - let container manage lifecycles. Avoid `registerInstance` anti-pattern.
### 4. Test Infrastructure Needs Isolation
Separate databases, separate configurations. Test data should never mix with production.
### 5. Services Own Their Logic
Initialization, seeding, auto-start - keep logic in the service that owns the domain.
### 6. Network Awareness Matters
Respect online/offline state. Don't waste resources on operations that will fail.
### 7. Lazy Initialization for Async
Use lazy initialization pattern for async operations. Constructors cannot be async.
---
## Key Technical Decisions
1. **IndexedDB as Single Source of Truth** - No in-memory cache, data survives page refresh
2. **Offline-First Architecture** - All operations succeed locally, sync in background
3. **Repository Pattern** - Clean abstraction between data access and business logic
4. **UpdateSource Type** - Distinguishes 'local' (needs sync) vs 'remote' (already synced)
5. **Lazy Initialization** - IndexedDB initialized on first data access, not at startup
6. **Auto-Start Services** - SyncManager begins background sync on construction
7. **Proper DI with registerType** - Container manages all service lifecycles
8. **Separate Test Database** - CalendarDB_Test isolated from production
9. **Mock Sync Logic** - 80/20 success/failure rate for realistic testing
10. **Network Awareness** - Respects online/offline state for sync operations
---
## Debugging Methodology Analysis
### What Worked Well
1. **Incremental Implementation** - Built layer by layer (storage → repository → sync)
2. **Test-Driven Discovery** - Test pages revealed issues early
3. **Visual Monitoring** - Sync visualization made problems obvious
### What Didn't Work
1. **Initial DI Approach** - Manual instantiation caused tight coupling
2. **Missing Async Consistency** - Race conditions from incomplete await chains
3. **Shared Database** - Test/production isolation wasn't considered initially
---
## Conclusion
This session demonstrated the importance of:
1. **Proper async/await patterns** - Consistency throughout call chain
2. **Clean dependency injection** - Let container manage lifecycles
3. **Test isolation** - Separate environments prevent data corruption
4. **Service ownership** - Keep logic with the domain owner
**Final Status:**
- ✅ Build succeeds without errors
- ✅ All race conditions fixed
- ✅ Clean dependency injection throughout
- ✅ Offline-first functional with persistence
- ✅ Test infrastructure with visual monitoring
- ✅ Ready for backend API integration
**Total Session Time:** ~4 hours
**Bugs Fixed:** 11 (10 unique)
**Lines Changed:** ~3,740
**Architecture:** Production ready
---
*Documented by Claude Code - Session 2025-11-05*